By the time Tyler Perry started seriously pursuing television, he had already spent years building an audience largely outside the traditional Hollywood system. His touring stage plays developed a devoted following, particularly among Black audiences that Perry believed Hollywood was underserving, and then came the movies.
“Diary of a Mad Black Woman,” based on Perry’s play, was released in 2005. Made for just $5.5 million, it earned more than $50 million at the domestic box office. A year later, “Madea’s Family Reunion” opened at #1 and went on to earn more than $63 million domestically on a $6 million budget.
Perry knew he had an audience. Convincing television executives to trust that audience was harder.
Years before “House of Payne” reached television, Perry pitched the concept to network executives. According to the Los Angeles Times, they liked the basic idea but wanted changes. The show’s central character, C.J. Payne, shouldn’t be a firefighter. Perry’s longtime stage collaborators Cassi Davis and LaVan Davis shouldn’t play major roles. The religious references should be toned down, and other writers should be brought in.
Perry later summarized what he heard in those meetings very simply: “They wanted a different show.“
And to be clear, Perry had a perfectly reasonable option sitting in front of him. He could have played the Hollywood game. That’s what 99% of people in his position would have done. Take the network’s money. Make the changes. Let someone else shoulder the enormous financial risk of producing the show.
That’s basically the dream. You don’t risk your personal fortune, and if you happen to create the next “Seinfeld,” your 5% or maybe 10% backend stake makes you rich when the show hits the syndication jackpot.
Perry chose almost the exact opposite path.
Rather than let Hollywood pay for a version of “House of Payne” that he didn’t want to make, he decided he would finance his version himself…
Aaron Davidson/Getty Images
The $5 Million Bet
Most television creators who reject a network’s notes don’t have many options. The studio controls the financing, the network controls distribution, and if nobody writes the check, there usually isn’t a television show.
Perry decided to remove that problem entirely. He spent about $5 million of his own money to produce 10 full episodes of “House of Payne” in Atlanta.
These weren’t rough pilots, trailers or presentations designed to show executives what the series might eventually look like. Perry financed 10 finished episodes before he had a traditional television buyer.
That represented an enormous personal risk. Perry was already successful by this point, but $5 million was still a huge amount of money to spend on a television series with no guarantee of national distribution. If viewers didn’t respond, Perry would be left owning a very expensive stack of episodes.
Then Perry and television distributor Debmar-Mercury tried something highly unusual. Instead of going through the traditional network pilot process, they placed the 10 episodes on local television stations in 10 test markets around the country and effectively allowed viewers to decide whether “House of Payne” deserved a future.
The results were difficult for television executives to ignore.
In Baltimore, “House of Payne” attracted twice the audience of the “Seinfeld” reruns it competed against. In New York, where it replaced reruns of Bernie Mac’s “The Bernie Mac Show” on WWOR, its audience was twice as large.
Perry no longer needed to walk into a network office and insist that there was an audience for his show. He had actual ratings proving it.
Then TBS Made An Unprecedented Bet
The results caught the attention of TBS, and what happened next was almost the inverse of the normal television business.
Traditionally, a network might order a pilot and then perhaps a short first season. If that worked, it would order another season. If the show survived for several years and accumulated enough episodes, it could eventually become enormously valuable through syndication.
“House of Payne” effectively jumped over that entire process.
In August 2006, TBS and Debmar-Mercury announced an unprecedented arrangement that would give TBS access to 100 episodes of “House of Payne.” Industry reports valued the distribution package at $200 million.
The structure would eventually become known as the 10/90 model: produce 10 episodes, prove that viewers want them, and then trigger a massive order for another 90. Instead of slowly crawling toward a syndication-sized library over five or six seasons, Perry could build one almost immediately.
There was also a crucial detail buried inside the structure of the deal: Tyler Perry owned the show.
Debmar-Mercury distributed it. TBS licensed it. Perry retained ownership and an extraordinary amount of creative control. One Debmar-Mercury executive described the arrangement at the time with remarkable simplicity: “Tyler Perry owns all the rights and we distribute it.”
The $140 Million Payday
Perry’s original $5 million didn’t literally turn into a $200 million check deposited into his personal bank account. He still had to produce an enormous amount of television, but he had already built a production system designed to create content extraordinarily quickly and inexpensively.
Perry served as creator, writer, director, producer and executive producer, eliminating layers of costs that normally accompanied a network sitcom. His Atlanta production operation could also shoot episodes at a pace that would have been extremely unusual in conventional television.
The economics were extraordinary. Perry personally pocketed $140 million from the “House of Payne” arrangement.
Then The Ratings Got Even Better
TBS’s $200 million commitment looked enormous when it was announced. Then “House of Payne” actually premiered nationally.
On June 6, 2007, TBS aired two back-to-back episodes. The first drew 5.2 million viewers, and the second drew 5.8 million. At the time, they were the two most-watched sitcom telecasts in the history of ad-supported cable television.
That was an extraordinary audience for TBS, which had averaged just 1.4 million viewers in primetime the previous month. Suddenly, the supposedly risky commitment to “House of Payne” looked considerably less risky.
Perry continued producing episodes at a pace that would have been almost unimaginable under a conventional network production schedule. The original run eventually produced 254 episodes, giving Perry an enormous television library that could continue generating licensing and syndication revenue long after the production costs had been paid.
Because he owned the underlying show, much of that long-term value belonged to Perry.
Hollywood Started Copying The “Tyler Perry Model”
The deal didn’t merely make Perry rich. It also created a television-production model that other companies and creators began trying to replicate.
Debmar-Mercury openly referred to the strategy as the “Tyler Perry model.” Perry used a similar structure for “Meet the Browns,” and versions of the 10/90 strategy subsequently appeared elsewhere in television.
Ice Cube’s sitcom “Are We There Yet?” received an initial 10-episode order from TBS before receiving another 90 episodes. A few years later, Charlie Sheen used another version of the model for “Anger Management” at FX.
The concept was simple but radical. Instead of spending years hoping a conventional television show survived long enough to accumulate enough episodes to become valuable in syndication, producers could make a small batch, prove the demand and then manufacture a huge library quickly.
Perry had found a shortcut. More importantly, he’d found one that allowed the creator to retain significantly more control over the asset being created.
The Deal That Explains Tyler Perry’s Fortune
Celebrity Net Worth currently estimates Tyler Perry’s net worth at $850 million, and you can draw a remarkably straight line from that fortune back to the decisions he made with “House of Payne.”
The lesson Perry took from Hollywood wasn’t merely that successful movies and television shows could make him rich. It was that the person who owns those movies and television shows can make dramatically more money than the person who simply receives a salary for creating them.
That philosophy eventually expanded far beyond “House of Payne.” Perry financed his own productions, retained rights to his work, built his own production infrastructure and ultimately created the massive Tyler Perry Studios complex in Atlanta. His approach to ownership also put him in rare company with media entrepreneurs such as Oprah Winfrey, who similarly built enormous wealth by owning and producing content rather than merely appearing in it.
Years later, while explaining why his economics looked so different from those of many other filmmakers, Perry boiled down his philosophy to its essence:
“I own the lights. I own the sets.“
